Complete Trip Engineering Summary · PowerBoost-LightShip Test Program

Prescott, Arizona → Oshkosh, Wisconsin → Prescott, Arizona

Recorded campaign summary, July 11-24, 2026. Focus: highway fuel efficiency, fuel dedicated to ProPower generation, and thermal limits/issues.
3,647.9 miRecorded travel distance
254.24 galRecorded trip fuel
14.35 MPGOverall recorded economy
86.5 kWh ACMeasured ProPower output
00

Executive Findings

Measured

The complete travel dataset totals 3,647.9 recorded miles, 254.24 gallons, and 14.35 MPG. Outbound economy was approximately 13.69 MPG; return economy was approximately 15.63 MPG. The return was about 14.2% more fuel-efficient, but the two directions were not controlled A/B tests.

The cleanest speed comparison came from Return Leg 1 with ProPower off and LightShip HVAC off. At 62 ± 2 mph, the truck returned 15.56 MPG; at 67 ± 2 mph, it returned 15.14 MPG. The faster band reduced MPG by 2.7%, raised hourly fuel use from 3.97 to 4.35 gal/hr, and increased mean engine load from 61.6% to 72.8%.

Modeled Allocation

Measured ProPower output totaled 86.5 kWh AC. Using the project baseline of 7.70 kWh AC per gallon, approximately 11.23 gallons were dedicated to electricity generation, or about 4.4% of all recorded fuel.

Thermal Flag

The highest thermal stress occurred during the July 23 Front Range climb. Logged maxima were 241.2°F coolant, 228.9°F transmission fluid, and 125.6°F hybrid-battery temperature. A reported ProPower shutdown occurred near Floyd Hill while external converter output was near zero. The protected component was not identified because no inverter-temperature PID or explicit ProPower fault-state channel was logged.

01

Trip-Level Fuel Efficiency

The aggregate MPG is useful for operating-cost and range planning, but it is not a pure vehicle-efficiency coefficient. The campaign intentionally varied ProPower state, TrekDrive state, speed, temperature, altitude, route, canopy condition, and battery-support configuration.

Fuel economy by travel segment
Figure 1 · Overall fuel economy by recorded travel segment
SegmentMilesFuelMPGProPowerMax OAT
AZ start segment 111.30.78 gal14.490.0 kWh73.4°F
AZ start segment 223.51.64 gal14.330.0 kWh76.6°F
Williams → Salida574.044.35 gal12.9426.4 kWh100.4°F
Salida → Broomfield157.012.79 gal12.2816.4 kWh104.0°F
Broomfield → North Platte252.918.19 gal13.9019.1 kWh90.0°F
North Platte → Aurora152.39.68 gal15.737.8 kWh93.0°F
Aurora → Adel237.815.14 gal15.715.1 kWh97.0°F
Adel → Oshkosh421.927.21 gal15.500.0 kWh95.0°F
Oshkosh → Grand Island660.143.24 gal15.270.0 kWh80.6°F
Grand Island → Parachute590.842.16 gal14.010.0 kWh89.6°F
Return day 3 segment 1205.212.91 gal15.894.9 kWh86.0°F
Return day 3 segment 2116.07.06 gal16.434.2 kWh88.0°F
Return day 3 segment 3245.116.29 gal15.052.7 kWh96.0°F

The July 14 TrekDrive calibration loops are excluded from point-to-point trip totals. The first two July 11 files are short early-day recordings; the long July 11 file provides the principal Williams-to-Salida record.

02

Highway Cruise-Speed Efficiency

Cruise speed comparison
Figure 2 · All-trip pooled bands versus the cleaner Return Leg 1 comparison

The all-trip pooled speed bands are strongly confounded by different grades, winds, ProPower states, temperatures, and gears. The Return Leg 1 comparison is preferred because both bands occurred on the same day with ProPower and LightShip HVAC off.

Metric62 ± 2 mph67 ± 2 mphInterpretation
Filtered distance267.1 mi156.6 miLarge samples in both bands
Integrated MPG15.5615.142.7% penalty at faster band
Mean fuel rate3.97 gal/hr4.35 gal/hr9.6% higher hourly burn
Mean engine RPM2,0221,802Faster band used higher gear more consistently
Mean absolute load61.6%72.8%18.3% higher load
Time above 90% load16.2%24.4%8.3 percentage points higher
Operational Conclusion

62 mph remains the preferred default cruise target for range, lower hourly fuel use, and thermal margin. The measured 67 mph penalty was moderate enough to remain a reasonable schedule-driven choice in cool conditions, but it placed the engine at materially higher load.

03

Fuel Dedicated to ProPower Generation

The two measured converter-output channels integrated to 86.5 kWh AC over the travel campaign. At the project's measured baseline conversion of 7.70 kWh AC/gal, this corresponds to 11.23 gallons of generation fuel.

QuantityValueBasis
Measured AC energy86.5 kWhIntegrated converter outputs 1 and 2
Baseline electrical yield7.70 kWh AC/galProject measured round-trip baseline
Allocated generator fuel11.23 galAC energy divided by baseline yield
Equivalent full-output fuel rateabout 0.64-0.65 gal/hrAt approximately 5.8 kW
Working uncertainty range0.55-0.75 gal/hrStanding project range
Share of recorded fuel4.4%Allocated generator fuel ÷ total fuel

This allocation is best treated as a trip-level energy budget and commercialization metric. It does not prove the truck would have burned exactly 11.23 fewer gallons with ProPower off because engine operating point, hybrid-battery behavior, grade, wind, and enrichment can change when the electrical load is removed.

Next Analysis

The measured 7.70 kWh AC/gal conversion and the approximately 0.64-0.65 gal/hr full-output penalty should be re-estimated using pooled matched-condition data now that the entire campaign is available in one repository.

04

Thermal Limits and Issues

Maximum logged temperatures
Figure 3 · Maximum valid logged temperatures across the campaign
Channel / EventMaximum or ObservationEngineering Interpretation
Outside air temperature104.0°FValid non-dropout maximum
Corrected coolant241.2°FPeak in the July 23 Floyd Hill event region
Transmission fluid228.9°FSubstantial thermal rise on mountain climb
Hybrid battery125.6°FHighest logged battery temperature
ProPower shutdownApprox. 11:50 MDT, July 23Occurred near Floyd Hill with converter output near zero
Protected componentNot identifiedNo inverter-temperature or fault-state PID
RecoveryRestart plus breaker resetProPower operation returned
Vail Pass follow-upApprox. 45 mph, no repeat warningCooler/slower comparison, not a strict A/B test

The low external AC output during the Floyd Hill warning argues against appliance overload, but it does not rule out a local inverter, converter, wiring, or enclosure-temperature threshold. The later successful Vail Pass climb supports reducing sustained climb speed when thermal margin is limited, but route, ambient temperature, grade profile, traffic, cooling airflow, and preconditioning all differed.

Separate LightShip charging-interface issue

The campaign also documented a distinct LightShip-side NACS/AeroHub thermal limitation. Charging stopped near the 102-105°F receptacle/EVSE range and resumed after cooling, with evidence of a possible restart lockout period. This must remain separate from the Ford ProPower shutdown in later fault-tree analysis.

Operational Guidance

On sustained grades, manage thermal margin proactively with lower speed, reduced simultaneous electrical load where practical, and explicit monitoring of coolant, transmission, hybrid-battery, and charging-interface temperatures. The most important missing measurement is inverter temperature or an explicit ProPower fault-code/state channel.

05

Scope, Data Quality, and Follow-On Work

This summary uses the complete uploaded set of point-to-point OBD travel recordings and excludes the July 14 calibration loops from trip totals. OBD trip counters provide segment distance and fuel; the two converter-output PIDs provide ProPower energy.

Several factors prevent a single pooled regression from being treated as a definitive vehicle model: incomplete synchronized wind data, differing grade profiles, wide temperature variation, changing ProPower and HVAC states, the July 16 canopy-up anomaly, and Battery Boost usage on the return.

Overall Conclusion

The trip demonstrates that the PowerBoost-LightShip combination can sustain long-distance travel with in-motion AC energy transfer while preserving useful towing fuel economy. The strongest summary-level findings are a practical 62 mph efficiency target, a generation cost near 0.64-0.65 gal/hr at 5.8 kW, and the need for explicit thermal-management rules on steep grades and in high ambient temperatures.